For in the hectic opening months of the Age of Trump, all sorts of political scenarios seemed plausible. It will be depicted as a time when - to political pugilists on both sides of the great divide - the fate of the American republic seemed at risk, and rancor ran deep.īut what did this “tale of sound and fury” actually signify and portend? For future historians this will be the crucial - and as yet unanswerable - question. It will be seen as a time of perfervid partisanship in which the very legitimacy of the new administration was challenged, and in which feisty tweets and aggressive initiatives from the White House were matched by feisty “resistance” in the media and on the streets, and by efforts by his opponents in the Senate to delay as long as possible the confirmation and installation of his Cabinet. Not so much because of its public policy outcomes - although some of these were audacious and controversial - but because of the stormy context in which policy decisions occurred. Nash, presidential biographer and author of The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America Since 1945:įuture historians will likely regard the first 100 days of Donald Trump’s presidency as the most dramatic launch of a new administration since 1933 and the most fraught with discord since 1861. One hundred days in, he still seems to prefer the former to the latter. Trump’s boasts now hang heavy in the air, prompting some to wonder whether the disappointments of this period will lead to a doubling down of his idiosyncratic view of the Presidency or some belated learning from the few pragmatists around him. It’s worth remembering that it was Trump who encouraged people to expect a lot of his first weeks in power. He ended as he started: the passionate preference of a minority of Americans. Whereas a lack of candor and civility seemed to place a cap on the new president’s popularity, it did not lead to much of an erosion of his core support. Nevertheless, despite the miscues, lies and blunders, the bottom did not drop out of the Trump presidency in its first 100 days. But, as the Repeal and Replace fiasco of the first 100 days showed, the Trumpian approach undermined coalition building even among Republicans. If they control both houses of Congress, Presidents can, of course, govern successfully without even a fig leaf of bipartisanship. He not only refused to offer an olive branch to those who did not support him in 2016 but he continued the harsh rhetoric of his campaign. Following a meeting with Democratic congressmen to discuss budgetary reform a week after his 100th day, President Reagan noted in his diary, “e really seem to be putting a coalition together.” Unlike Reagan, Donald Trump has not used his first 100 days to fashion a governing coalition. The start of a presidency can reveal a lot about the character, political and managerial skills of the country’s new Head of State. Timothy Naftali, clinical associate professor of history and public service at New York University and former director of the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum: This is the greatest of all lessons of history. We’ve got to get back to the reality that nothing of consequence is ever accomplished alone. It’s not just outlandish and beyond reality, it’s dangerous. It’s outrageous and intolerable, as has never happened to this extent, even close to this extent, ever before. He says things that are blatantly untrue. Where do you start? He reverses himself on his positions. This volume gathers these works and commemorates the project.The worst ever. Starting on September 8, 2010, for 100 days, one artwork was showcased online daily, ending with an exhibition displaying a selection of the best contributions. This involves culture which can only be acquired by self-education: human beings should mirror the world. It is not enough to follow world politics, see films and read the prizewinning bestsellers, she insists this is superficial, you need to go deep in order to understand who you are, what the world is and how things could be better. The website invited people to submit an artwork, slogan or photograph responding to Westwoods conception of Active Resistance to Propaganda, in which she argues for cultures capacity to elevate humanity above self-destruction. Book Synopsis Vivienne Westwood invites artistic responses posing Active Resistance to PropagandaIn 2010 Vivienne Westwood and Lee Jeans launched an online manifesto-installation titled 100 Days of Active Resistance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |